Write a final chapter

1. Important aspects of a final chapter A student term paper generally consists of the elements introduction, main part and conclusion. The conclusion is the counterpart to the introduction. This basic structure should be kept in mind, Write my essay because many students "forget" the end of their studies, especially at the beginning of their studies, Write my essay and believe that they have said all the essentials when they have worked out the main part of their work. A final chapter seems to many to be an unnecessary repetition. This impression is wrong, because the end has an important task: It serves to summarize the most important results of the work and to give the reader an overview of what has been achieved in the work. To this end, the final chapter should consider the following aspects: (i) Referring to the question formulated in the introduction: What was my central question? What did I want to find out with my work? (ii) To summarize: How did I develop my topic? What are the most important statements in my work? (iii) Formulating the results: What did I find out with my work? (iv) Formulating gaps: What did I not cover (giving reasons)? Formulation of further questions: What could also be of interest in my area? (v) Give an outlook: What could a future development look like? example 1 Let us assume that we have to write a term paper on the subject of "The Part of Speech Classification in German". At least three different grammars should be used for this purpose. In the introduction of a term paper it is stated that the following aspects should be dealt with: (1) Problems creating part-of-speech classifications (2) Manageability and consistency (3) Introducing the Menzel, DUDEN and Flämig classifications A conclusion of this work, which contains three of the mentioned aspects, could look like this. (We have marked the aspects mentioned in square brackets at the end of the section.) 5. Conclusion It became clear that when creating a part-of-speech classification system, one must first be clear about the criteria to be used. Both Menzel and Flämig, as well as in the DUDEN grammar, My Premium Essay mainly address three different criteria (morphological, syntactic, semantic). How these criteria are applied, however, varies. [Reference to aspect (1) of the introduction, formulation of the results] Menzel uses a hierarchizing, heterogeneous system in which the types of speech are first sorted according to morphological, then syntactic and only finally according to semantic criteria. All three criteria are used in the DUDEN grammar, but not as a hierarchical system. Flämig initially completely excludes the semantic criteria and only refers to morphological and syntactic criteria. [Reference to aspect (3) of the introduction, summary] In my opinion, the fact that semantic criteria are excluded makes Flämig's grammar clear and easy to use. The DUDEN grammar seems confusing because it does not have a hierarchical system. Menzel's grammar seems clearer and its origin easier to understand. [Reference to aspect (2) of the introduction, formulation of results] Now look at the following examples of final chapters and consider how well these chapters inform the reader about the essential aspects of the work. Example 2 According to the introduction of a term paper, the following aspects should be dealt with: (1) What are part of speech definitions and functions? (2) Is there a uniform categorization? (3) Introducing three different categorizations (4) Critical comparison. The end of this term paper looks like this: 4 Conclusion In my term paper I wanted to make clear the differences in the possibilities of the different categorizations of the parts of speech on the basis of different grammars. I actually find it very difficult to compare these three theoretical views, buy assignment online since the intention of each grammar is completely different and each of the grammars is geared towards a different group of readers. Menzel's grammar should be short, understandable and geared towards schoolchildren, the Duden grammar is intended as a detailed reference work for everyone and the grammar of the German language is aimed at specialist readers who want to deal more intensively with the categorizations. With the first sentence of the conclusion, the aspects (3) and (4) mentioned in the introduction are taken up again. However, we do not learn anything about the results of the processing of these aspects in the further course. Instead, the second sentence contains an evaluation of work step (4). In this context a new aspect is introduced: the target group orientation. The rest of the text indicates the addressee orientation of the three grammars discussed. There is no longer any reference to the questions formulated in the introduction. There is also no formulation of gaps, further questions or an outlook. Example 3 Conclusion From this work I draw the conclusion for myself that it is worthwhile not only to fall back on a text in order to familiarize oneself with a linguistic topic. The comparison of different representations from different perspectives enables a more holistic understanding. Example 3 mentions the personal knowledge the writer has gained from his work on scientific work in general. That doesn't necessarily belong in the end. The reader is not given any information on any of the above issues. Example 4 Ratings or information about personal preferences as we find them in the following text excerpt are rather unusual in a final chapter, but are not generally considered to be inadmissible. Summary (...) Personally, I would prefer the Menzel vocabulary structure because it is the most plausible. Another reason for my positive attitude towards this classification is probably that I am used to it. (...) 2. Choice of a suitable formulation for the heading of the final chapter The introduction in term papers (almost) always means introduction , but the end does not always mean the end The following is a list of frequently used headings for a final chapter and an assessment of their usefulness. Enough Neutral form, analogous to "Introduction". summary A summary gives the important statements and results of a work briefly and concisely. A summary should make up part of the final chapter, but conversely, the entire final chapter should not consist of a summary. outlook The outlook should address the question "What could future development look like?" respond. This aspect should be considered in the final chapter, but conversely, it should not make up the entire final chapter. valuation The evaluation suggests a personal statement by the author. It can be an aspect in the final chapter, but it does not have to be. Shot consideration / closing words These terms are less common in term papers. Conclusion / résumé The terms conclusion and résumé are the most frequently used formulations for the final chapter and are used synonymously. They imply that the following text formulates the results of the work. Since the formulation of the results is the central task of the final chapter, these headings seem to have been chosen sensibly.